Being-Time and the Logged Second…

Being-Time and the Logged Second…

Spirituality isn't about the afterlife.

It's about learning to live — and live right — here, while we're here. Fr. AMA used to say it comes down to having a healthy, balanced relationship with Power, Money, and Sex. Often he'd add: it starts from Sex, Power, Money, in that order. I've started adding Time to the list now. The first three, at least conceptually, are easy enough to get a handle on. Time is not.

Just 2 days ago, a friend and erstwhile colleague, in a WhatsApp group posted about binge-watching OTT to kill time, and not remembering any of it the next day — so he said he wasn't the right person to give suggestions.

 I replied: You don't have to kill time. It dies by itself. Time doesn't need our help — it's the ultimate self-destructing entity. Every second we try to "kill" is already a corpse by the time we take aim. 🙂

And thinking about it more — if time is already dead by the time we aim at it, there was no marksman either. Just the aiming-thought arising and passing, like everything else. That's the trick nobody tells you about time. You can hoard money, misuse power, indulge or repress desire — all of these hold still enough to be gripped, negotiated with, renounced. Time was never there to be gripped. It's gone in the reaching.

The great Zen Master Dogen never wrote a book on money or power. He wrote one on time — Uji, being-time — because this is the subtlest of the four. Firewood doesn't become ash, he said. Firewood has its own before and after; ash has its own before and after. The moment doesn't survive into the next moment to be spent or saved or killed. Each moment is already complete, disclosing the whole of being-time in itself.

Which is what made my friend's reply the more interesting koan, more than the binge-watching itself. Not remembering any of it the next day — that's not a confession of failed willpower. It's a fairly precise report of time passing with no witness built around it. No thread laid down. Could be dissociation — going out the back door. Or, minus the noticing, it could be close to what Dogen is pointing at — time occurring with nothing accumulating. Same shape from outside. Not the same from inside. Worth asking him — not as correction, but as a real question — was he absent, or just unaccumulating? Those look identical the next morning. They are not the same door.

And then this morning, a colleague from twenty years ago — we were on the same team once — shares this: Wipro deploys real-time productivity monitoring tool for employees. Wipro. A place I “worked” quite a number of time years, across three separate stints.

TimeScope, they're calling it. Rolled out to 5,000 employees in May, now expanding — fixed-price teams, billable roles, support functions, even people on the bench. It watches login duration, periods of inactivity, time spent inside Word, Excel, Outlook, Chrome. If there's no evidence of login on a working day, leave gets deducted. You can contest it, they say. They also say it isn't tracking keystrokes or screen content — just presence. Just whether you were, provably, there.

I read that and thought: this is the exact inversion of what I wrote to my friend two days ago.

I told him time doesn't need killing — it dies by itself, it's already a corpse by the time you take aim. TimeScope needs the opposite to be true. It needs time to be a substance that can be caught being wasted. It needs the murder weapon and the body, because without evidence of the kill, they dock your leave. It is institutionalising the very delusion my one-liner was trying to dissolve — that time is something you can hoard, spend, or be caught not spending, rather than something already gone in the reaching.

And of course it isn't really about time. It never is. This is Power and Money borrowing Time's clothes — a dashboard is Power, a xxx-basis-point margin drop is Money — dressed up as neutral, technical measurement so it doesn't have to announce itself as what it actually is: surveillance wearing a lab coat. With Sex, Power, Money, you can at least see the greed plainly when someone's caught in it. With Time, the greed gets to disguise itself as efficiency, as data, as fairness — "we're not accusing you, the dashboard is just telling us the truth."

A dashboard on every login gap. Different scale, same species of attention — the gaze that can only trust what it can measure, turned on something that was never suited to being measured that way. Thirty years, three stints — and this is where the place has arrived. Not because anyone there is evil. Because margin pressure, like every hungry ghost, eventually runs out of everything else to extract, and starts extracting your presence itself, second by logged second. By the way the  hungry ghost is a Buddhist legend — beings with tiny mouths and enormous stomachs, never satisfied. That's not demonisation. That's diagnosis.

And that is diagnosing a civilisational confusion.  In my view, we have mistaken the measurable for the real. We have mistaken logged presence for lived presence.

Stopped time and Frozen tears:  Maps in our mind and borders in our heart

Stopped time and Frozen tears:  Maps in our mind and borders in our heart

“While the image of the “corpse train” arriving full of the dead and mutilated remains perhaps the most enduring icon of Partition, most passenger services had been halted after the initial attacks. The worst massacres only came to pass now. Over the weekend of September 20-21, four of the Pakistan Specials rolled across the border and into Lahore one after the other, their floors slick with blood. Some had been attacked multiple times. One train’s escort had fended off a jatha in 45 minutes of ferocious hand-to-hand fighting. Another had lost several hundred passengers, including 62 children under the age of eight. On September 22, after a refugee train coming the other way arrived in Amritsar full of non-Muslim dead and wounded, the Sikh fighters went berserk. A mob estimated at 10,000 people swarmed a Pakistan-bound train full of Muslim refugees, firing automatic rifles, tossing bombs, and slashing away with swords. Only 200 horribly wounded passengers survived; at least 1,500 people were killed, including the British commander of the train’s escort. Bourke-White arrived at the scene soon afterward. All along the platform, she later wrote, blue-turbaned Sikhs sat cross-legged, their curved kirpans across their knees, patiently waiting for the next arriving Special.”

  • An excerpt from Nisid Hajari’s Midnight's Furies: The Deadly Legacy of India's Partition

 We, Thara and Rishi and I, were at the Partition Museum, which is housed at the Amritsar Townhall building.  The red colored sandstone building was an old British Commissionerate and jail.  It was just a stone throwaway from Jalian Wala Bagh, the place of once of the worst criminal act by an army officer in recorded history. If  one is sensitive enough, one could still hear the cries and commotion from the Jalian Wala Bagh, as Col. Reginald Dyer, vulture army, opened fired at an innocent congregation of freedom fighters.  

 The roads between the Golden Temple, Jalian Wala Bagh and Town is a pedestrian only cobbled walkway.  And what catches the eye is the standard shop signages, which melts into the stone-colored building and huge statues of some remarkable Indians. If one can tolerate or ignore the number of touts, who wants to take you to the Wagah border ceremony, it is a quite an enjoyable walk.   

 The partition museum seems to be a new addition, especially compared Golden Temple, and Jalian Wala Bagh, which were witness so many generation’s smiles and tears, sukoon and blood, pride and prejudice… Also it portrays the dark, hateful, animal side of humans along with Jalian Wala Bagh compared to the golden side of being human of Golden Temple.

The museum is the brain child of Mallika Ahluwalia, a Harvard graduate, whose grandparents, both paternal and maternal, were  tragic victims of barbaric violence from the partition.

 We had plan to make a quick round of the place and head to our lunch. Our driver Guri Saheb, a young, very affable and devout Sardar reminded us he can’t park of long Infront of the Brothers Dhaba. Locals and tourists throng that Dhaba for that utterly Butterly kulcha and piping hot Channa.

 We were just skimming through the halls, especially about the politics of those times, so that we ticked our tourist to do checklist, till we reached, center of  Hall of Migration and Refuge.   There was a small well, depicting the suicides by many women who jumped into and killed them to save their honour during those times.  There was a beautiful phulkari dupatta draped across the walls near that well.  The note said it was donated by one Mr. Randhawa, whose aunt was asked by her kith and kin to jump into the well and save her honour from being raped and killed.  She chose not to and was rescued by a Muslim man and it was one of the stories of kindness and humaneness shown by many across all communities in midst of hatred, anger and bloodshed.

 And just next to that was the booth which displayed the portraits by Sardari Lal Parashar. How does one draw grief, loss, sadness, suffering!!!  Parashar was an acclaimed   painter, etcher, sculptor and writer. and writer on the other side of the divide before the lines were drawn on a piece of map.

 

Source: S.L. Parashar 1904–1990, Time, Space, Light, Consciousness

After crossing over the blood-soaked border, his first job was as Commandant in a refugee camp in Baldev Nagar, Ambala. The overwhelming and painful atmosphere of sorrow, fear and anguish of the inmates of that refugee camp, got into his sketches.  And those sketches became one telling story of the horrors of partition.

 Even after all these years, pain and suffering was still a fresh in those sketches.  I had to go back to the booth downstairs, booth of Sir Cyril Radcliffe, the man who was mainly responsible for one of the most man created calamity and cold-blooded mayhem in the world.  Even the most conservative figures shows the depth humans descended. A BBC article on partition says  “ About 12 million people became refugees. Between half a million and a million people were killed in religious violence. Tens of thousands of women were abducted.”

 

 

The poem by W H Auden in the booth just says part of the story about the main villain.  

 

Let me quote from an interview  of Radcliff  by veteran journalist Kuldeep Nayyar in 1976.  

“To make an 'impartial' decision, the British chose English Barrister Sir Cyril Radcliffe to draw the boundary that would demarcate the Punjab and Bengal provinces. Radcliffe had never visited British India or written about it ever in his professional life as a lawyer.

He virtually had no knowledge of the subcontinent, which was why he was chosen as somebody who'd make an 'unbiased' decision. He was given two Muslim and Hindu Judges  each to help in the task.”

So that's how the story of Radcliffe lines goes. An English barrister, who never set foot in India before July 8, 1947, decided which families would be part of India and which houses would go to East and West Pakistan.

 “According to records, Radcliffe barely knew where Punjab and Bengal were, yet he accepted the job as a man with a deep sense of duty.   In that interview,  he reveals that he 'had almost given Lahore to India but was then told how Pakistan would be left without any major city' as the decision to give Calcutta to India was already taken.

In one corner in that book tells the story of the necklace from Mohenjo-Daro.  “When the necklace was separated into two sections, Pakistan received a portion of six light-green jade beads and three agate-jasper pendants. Currently, this half of the necklace is on exhibit at the Mohenjo Daro Museum in Pakistan, while the other half is located in the National Museum in New Delhi, India.

In the same interview with Nayar, he further said ''the time at my disposal was so short that I could not do a better job. However, if I had two to three years, I might have improved on what I did.'' Five weeks - in just five weeks - the fate of millions of people got sealed and this unleashed an epic humanitarian crisis. “

So saddened was Radcliffe to hear about the death of people on either side of the lines that he refused to accept the payment for his work.  Then that is the story of. A Lawyer who worked probono !  I was wondering, why would a person ever undertake such a task with hasty deadlines.

 Thirty years after the partition, Sir Cyril died in April 1977 in Britain. It is said that after drawing the 'Radcliffe Line', he left India the very next day and never came to the country again.

“That which passes, isn't time. You and I are transitory, time is eternal. Or rather, it passes and is yet eternal.”
― Gulzar, Raavi Paar and Other Stories

 The last section of the museum was the best part. The section of Hope. The extra ordinary story of ordinary people, who saw the worst of human nature, still chose to be good human beings.  Those men excelled as human beings and transcended the slippery slope of hatred and anger.   Milkha Singh, Hero Motors Munjal, Manmohan Singh, The father of Indian IT industry. F. C. Kohli.   Manmohan Singh taped voice told me that how his grandfather was brutally murdered in cold blood in Peshawar and after crossing over to Amritsar after partition, he studied for intermediate and BA at the Motilal Nehru Library which is next door to the Town hall where the partition museum is there.  He could not afford books and as a refugee, he could study only because his college waived his fees.  The endless list goes on….  The seed of hatred takes root only on petty and weak hearts. The founder of the Parition Museum had written a wonderful book  of 21 inspirational stories.  There could be many more unheralded ones.

After penning a short note on the visitors book, It was time to go to Wagah border show, the beating retreat or Flag lowering ceremony. It so seems in the ancient days, the war used to start at the sunrise and end at the sunset.  Remember the story in Sauptika parva, the Book of sleepers, 10th Chapter of Mahabharata.  After the 18th day of the war, 3 Kauravas led by Ashwatthama, enters the Pandava camp in the middle of the night and slaughters the sleeping, Pandavas. At the end, even after the victory only 8 Pandava men were alive and 3 Kauravas.    Ironically our driver told us that Wagah is the Pakistan side of the border.  Indian side is known as Attari. Was wondering why the patriotic Indians promote Pakistan! There was already a huge crowd assembled waiting for the security check, to be let in to the semicircular Coliseum style stadium facing the gate from the Indian side. There is a similar and smaller stadium on the other side.  All of us were made to pass through a metallic detector and thoroughly frisked.  The BSF jawans did not even let a cigar lighter to the venue.  The soundboxes blared the patriotic songs from Hindi Movies of Ajit Kumar to SRK. After some time, a jawan with a wireless mic in hand appeared on the road and started egging the audience for louder support and hooting the other side.  In between, he used to run towards the border gate. Then all the girsl in the crowd were asked to be on the road and suddenly it turned into a disco with patriotic songs blaring. A rope was tied at a distance from the gate so that, people don’t run across the road in their excitement .  Then the show started. Performed by the Border Security Force of India and the Pakistan Rangers, the lowering of flags is a choreographed drill, speed marches, really high kicks. ( I thought their foot hit on their head and foot stampings.  They started at each other , twirling their big moustaches amidst slogan chanting.  While we watched the spectacle from bench seats, there is a VIP gallery  with a huge number of foreigners and other dignitaries.

eanwhile Sun had crossed the Radcliff drawn border to the other side, without a passport, visa and body, without body frisking or not having to move through a metal detector.  Still, it did not hesitate to share its light and glory with us on this side of the border. During the whole time, guards both BSF and Pakistan Rangers stood facing the crowds on their side, with their backs to each other.  Maybe they trust the other side guards more.  It was not long ago, a suicide bomber detonated himself just a few meters away from the border gate on the Pakistan side killing many.  

After the flags on the both sides were lowered in a very synchronized and meticulous way, there was a brisk handshake between the guards and smile on their face before they closed the gates.  Maybe they are known to each other as they stand guard every single day.

 As Sun decides to say goodbye to all of us, we got up.  The BSF Jawan on the mic, did urge everyone to dump the garbage in dustbins. No one paid heed. We all left behind a badly littered stadium and hurried back to the car parking.  On our return trip back, I was thinking about the narrow line painted across the road in between those two gates. How many litres of human blood, would have been used by Radcliff to paint it. A dictator or an army general in power in Pakistan may need that choreographed drama every day to distract their citizens.  But does a strong and vibrant country such as ours should lower ourselves to their level !!!  IS the strength of a human or nation depends on decibel levels or  staring down each other twirling moustaches !!!!

 I am no romantic.  I reckon, the borders are a reality which cannot be wished away. Animals in the wild, too mark their borders.  From the Voyageurs wolf project, they have published the GPS tracked territory of 7 wolf packs way back in 2018. It is a way of nature to ensure , each one of them, whether they are single or pack, gets their resources needed for their survival. Whether it is grass or preys.

 In our minds as well as in the world we live to die and die and kill to live.  When I got to have a door and wall to save myself from my siblings, a fence to keep that neighbor away, and a border even within a country to say my river belongs to me, how can one have an issue with a border between the “nations” .   

 Especially when that border gets written with human blood.  Blood and belonging goes together always.  But the moot point is, when wolfs and wild animals, still stay and live the way since they originated in mother earth, we, humans, take pride in our evolvement and progress.

The sagely phrase Vasudhiava Kumtumbakam do suggest that our ancestors did transcend those animalistic tendencies (The phrase Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam is made up of three Sanskrit words, Vasudhaa (earth/world), iva (like) and kutumbakam (large/extended family). The verse finds mention in Maha Upanishad (VI. 72); and is further referred to in the Hitopadesha and other literary works of India).

 But suddenly in the current era, that sounds so archaic.    Did we regress  to in Neanderthal times !!!

Whiz Kids: Precepts and Concepts

Whiz Kids: Precepts and Concepts

Note: This blog was written on 8 July 2009, when Nandan Nilekani was drafted into an important role in UPA govt of Manmohan Singh.   This is part of my “History repeats itself, first as farce and then as tragedy” series.   As there is some controversy on NDA Govt’s lateral entry ( immediately after the clamour for 70 hour workweek)  this seems to relevant,  like Peter Drucker , the Sage of Management .  As the saying goes “history repeats itself … :-).

Recent appointment of Nandan Nilekani as head of UID project brought back the old clamouring of “Bring the professionals to Govt” which filled the pages of pink papers during the recent election run of Capt. Gopinath and Meera Sanyal. With due respect to one of the most celebrated Indian businessman of this generation, I would urge the reader to not to rush in taking sides and read the following passage.

 In this context, it was quite interesting to read the havoc created by the foremost whiz kid in govt. of this era, Robert McNamara who died recently. McNamara was criticized for applying his abstract thinking to management of the Vietnam War, ignoring the human and moral elements of the conflict. It was said, "McNamara treated everybody like they were a spare part on a Ford".

In his later years McNamara sought to atone for his role, and advocated a rethinking of the US and UK nuclear posture, advocating nuclear disarmament. But it was too little too late. His grudging mea culpa was just not good enough for a generation who had known him as Bomber Bob whose great abilities in statistics just ensured more Japanese and Vietnamese deaths and maiming.

 When William F Buckley said that he would rather be governed by the first 2000 people in the Boston Telephone directory than by two thousand Harvard Professors, he did have valid point.

As De Bono rightly said “Many highly intelligent people are poor thinkers. Many people of average intelligence are skilled thinkers. The power of a car is separate from the way the car is driven. One has to watch the movie Enron: the smartest people in the room to see this opinion at its extreme.

In much more moderated view a high powered IQ without the ability of empathetic perception is a sure recipe to disaster. High powered IQ will just take us faster to the brink. If the reams of papers have to be believed Nandan is someone who was blessed with equal amount of EQ to match his famed IQ. I end my case with a great passage from Peter Drucker’s semi-autobiographical account “Adventures of a bystander”.

In the chapter titled “Ernest Friedberg’s World,” Drucker writes about two old-line merchants. The first of these, called “Uncle Henry” by those who knew him, was the founder and owner of a large and successful department store. When Drucker met him, he was already in his eighties. Uncle Henry was a businessman who did things by intuition more than by formal analysis, and his own son Irving, a Harvard B-School graduate, was appalled at “the unsystematic and unscientific way the store was being run.”

Drucker remembers his conversations with Uncle Henry. “He would tell stories constantly, always to do with a late consignment of ladies’ hats, or a shipment of mismatched umbrellas, or the notions counter. His stories would drive me up the wall. But gradually I learned to listen, at least with one ear. For surprisingly enough he always leaped to a generalisation from the farrago of anecdotes and stocking sizes and color promotions in lieu of markdowns for mismatched umbrellas.”

 Reflecting many years later, Drucker observes: “There are lots of people with grasshopper minds who can only go from one specific to another–from stockings to buttons, for instance, or from one experiment to another–and never get to the generalization and the concept. They are to be found among scientists as often as among merchants. But I have learned that the mind of the good merchant, as also of the good artist or good scientist, works the way Uncle Henry’s mind worked. It starts out with the most specific, the most concrete, and then reaches for the generalization.” Drucker also knew another leading merchant, Charles Kellstadt (who had once run Sears.) Kellstadt and Drucker served together on a Department of Défense advisory board (on procurement policy), and Kellstadt told “the same kind of stories Uncle Henry had told.” Drucker says that his fellow board members “suffered greatly from his interminable and apparently pointless anecdotes.”

On one occasion, a “whiz kid” (this was during the McNamara era) was presenting a proposal for a radically new approach to defence pricing policy. Kellstadt “began to tell a story of the bargain basement in the store in Chillicothe, Ohio, where he had held his first managerial job, and of some problem there with the cup sizes of women’s bras. He would stop every few sentences and ask the bewildered Assistant Secretary a question about bras, then goes on. Finally, the Assistant Secretary said, “You don’t understand Mr. Kellstadt; I’m talking about concepts.” “So am I,” said Charlie, quite indignant, and went on. Ten minutes later all of us on the board realized that he had demolished the entire proposal by showing us that it was far too complex, made far too many assumptions, and contains far too many ifs, buts, and when.” After the meeting, another board member (dean of a major engineering school) said admiringly, “Charlie that was a virtuoso performance. But why did you have to drag in the cup sizes of the bras in your bargain basement forty years ago?” Drucker reports that Charlie was surprised by the question: “How else can I see a problem in my mind’s eye?”

From these two encounters, Drucker draws this conclusion: “Fifty years or more ago the Uncle Henry’s and the Charlie Kellstadts dominated; then it was necessary for Son Irvin to emphasize systems, principles, and abstractions. There was need to balance the overly perceptual with a little conceptual discipline. I still remember the sense of liberation during those years in London when I stumbled onto the then new Symbolical Logic (which I later taught a few times), with its safeguards against tautologies and false analogies, against generalizing from isolated events, that is, from anecdotes, and its tools of semantic rigor. But now we again need the Uncle Henrys and Charlie Kellstadts.

 We have gone much too far toward dependence on untested quantification, toward symmetrical and purely formal models, toward argument from postulates rather than from experience, and toward moving from abstraction to abstraction without once touching the solid ground of concreteness. We are in danger of forgetting what Plato taught at the very beginning of systematic analysis and thought in the West, in two of the most beautiful and moving of his Dialogues, the Phaedrus and the Krito…They teach us that experience without the test of logic is not “rhetoric” but chitchat, and that logic without the test of experience is not “logic” but absurdity. Now we need to learn again what Charlie Kellstadt meant when he said, “How else can I see a problem in my mind’s eye?””

Skip to content