Still Water and Ice: On Memory
Uncommon understanding
Feynman is supposed to have said, imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings.. Well, that is memory. The thing being remembered has feelings, and so does the one remembering.
Unlike common understanding, human memory is not like memory stored in silicon chips in computers.. To start with, our memory is not created completely from the outside in. Our past memories and mindset molds and filters are already at work, actively shaping how we perceive the present, and so they shape the very memory that is being created .And then, every single time we think about something, it gets overwritten.. a new version takes its place. The oldest memories are often the most edited ones, simply because we have revisited them the most.
Memory is not a chip
A chip returns the same bytes every time, faithful but lifeless. Human memory is alive, and that is exactly why it is unreliable. The past is not a file but living tissue, constantly re-stitched with present mood, need, and the shape of who I think I am. That is why two people who stood in the same room can carry such different memories of it.. they are not remembering the same room, they are inhabiting different rooms.
What this means for those who help
One of the biggest mistakes coaches and counselors make is to buy into the content of what a client recalls as their past traumas.. not doubting the pain, which is real, but treating the story as a faithful record when it has been re-stitched many times over. That is where the third wave therapy systems like ACT work better.. They work on the relationship we have with those memories and feelings, and are not so worried about the actual content of it.
It is really a travesty that Adler, who stood with Freud and Jung as one of the three founders of depth psychology, did not get the prominence he deserved.. He held that we are shaped not by what happened to us but by the meaning we give it, and to my mind his theories just blow away the other two.
Which brings me to Frankl, who began in Adler's circle in Vienna before going his own way.. He saw the three great Viennese schools as the will to pleasure, the will to power, and the will to meaning, and he placed his own logotherapy at the end of that line. The distinction is valid, I think, though Adler was subtler than the label suggests. In his mature work the striving for significance was tied to social interest, to contributing to others, and that is already very close to meaning. So can we consider meaning as power? I would say yes, but power to rather than power over. Meaning is what lets us respond to what has happened instead of being merely shaped by it. It gives back agency where circumstances give none, and that was Frankl's whole witness from the camps.. in the words of Nietzsche that he loved to quote, he who has a why to live can bear almost any how. But Frankl would resist calling it power in the usual sense. Meaning has to be found in something beyond oneself, and the moment we chase it as a way to feel stronger, it slips away, the way happiness does when we chase it. Used as a tool for self-enhancement, it slides right back into the will to power.
Still water and ice
This post began with a question from an HR professional, who asked how I would coach someone who is very difficult, but carries a high level of composure. The answer that came to mind at once was the Zen difference between still water and ice. This is what I shared : "In Zen we say a still mind is like still water: it reflects the moon exactly as it is. Ice is still too, but it distorts the moon, and it cannot flow. Some composure is presence; some is ice, a frozen stance that can show up as stubbornness or quiet resistance. And only genuine warmth melts ice."
Remembering is moving water, but then it is poured through the mould of a frozen view.. who I am, who wronged me, what that moment meant. The water comes out in the shape of the mould, and then we call the shape "what happened". The mould is selfing: I am the one wronged, the one who succeeded, the one who failed.
The molds and filters in our mind, which convert the reality of the flowing water out there into experience, are our memory.. our nurture. And this is a different concept, at a higher level. When we are born, tabula rasa, we do not have these molds and templates to crystallize the reality that pours in. It is nurture that creates them, the molds, the filters and the templates. and we never meet the water as it is, only as it has been shaped on its way in.
Zen's contribution here is not to make memory more accurate. It is to notice the freezing. Zazen does not stop memories from arising. It stops the immediate freezing.. the instant story, verdict, identity.
Even meaning can freeze, and this is where Zen has a caution to offer.. A story like "this suffering was for a reason" or "it all happened to make me who I am" can become one more mould that we pour experience through, and then we mistake the shape for the truth. Meaning held like that is ice, a verdict arrived at in advance. The meaning worth having is closer to still water.. a responsiveness in the moment, a willingness to ask again, each time, what this situation is calling for from me, and to let the answer be different tomorrow. Held lightly, meaning gives us the power to respond. Held tightly, it becomes one more way of being fixed.
Letting go is not forgetting
This is not only theory for me. I am currently reading The Courage to Be Disliked, the very first book I have read on Adler's way of psychology, and around the same time Fr. AMA wrote to me that unless I let go of my past, with its bitterness, resentment and anger, I would not be able to teach. According to him, letting go does not mean forgetting. It means having a better relationship with it.. much the way ACT puts it.
I find that I can now read his words differently. The book argues that we are not caused by our past but live by the purposes we choose now, and it goes so far as to say that trauma does not exist. I would not go that far. The hurt was real, and pretending otherwise would only freeze it harder. What can change is the mould I pour it through. Bitterness held as a verdict about who I am and who wronged me is ice. The same feeling met with awareness, allowed to arise and pass, is still water. A teacher does not need an unmarked past. The task is not to teach from the wound, and not to push it away either.. just to stop letting it decide how the present gets shaped.
In fact, a teacher who has suffered, lost, and rebuilt is often more useful than one who has never been touched by fire. One's healed wound is the most sacred credential. A wound is raw and bleeding. It demands attention. It says: 'Look at what happened to me. Look at what they did.' A scar is healed. It remembers. It even tells the story. But it no longer bleeds. It no longer runs the present. It is simply part of the landscape of the body — a mark of survival.
The book has another idea that has stayed with me, the separation of tasks. How others see me, judge me or remember me is their task. What I do with my own practice and my teaching is mine. That, perhaps, is the courage to be disliked. to let others hold their memories of me as they will, and to keep my own water still.
A dew drop and the moon
Still water, even a dew drop of it, reflects the moon as it is. Dōgen says in the Genjōkōan that the whole moon and the entire sky are held in a single drop on a blade of grass. Reflection needs no storage, and leaves nothing behind to be edited. Ice distorts.
Perhaps this is what zazen trains us in.. to see without instantly freezing what is seen into a story to be filed away.
So when a two-liner arrives from the one who pointed to the way.. “Go and teach with what you have and what I gave you. Blessings”.. that is the true dew drop on the tip of the grass. Nothing stored in it, nothing to edit, and the whole moon is there.
And I can see the full moon hovering over the Perumalmalai hills.
In Gasshō,
Vishy Sankara (Shizenkara)












